CIG, love the RRR mention earlier this morning, really helps understand that the Liberator is truly meant to be a light carrier. However, one question that wasn't answered from that post was: are the "gravity bubble" above all top pads working as intended? It seems like a strange metric outside of ship size classification is allowing for some ships to fit and stay locked onto the ground, as a Freelancer DUR can fit and stay locked onto the pad (9.5m height) but a Hull-B which is roughly the same height cannot land and stay locked on the pad. I would love for someone at CIG to please come out and say whether the actual ship landing functionality is working properly, as it would provide a lot more clarity on what is intended for the Liberator to accept. Is there a height limit to ships on a Liberator pad? Size limit? The Clipper is a S2 ship and can't land and stay locked but the Zeus as a S3 ship can fit on it and stay locked. Additionally, I tested the Vanguard (also 9.5 meters tall) and while the Freelancer DUR fit and locked onto the pad with roughly the same height, the Vanguard did not. Oh, and this causes really funny edge cases, such as the Starlite that for some reason can't land but is a small starter refueler. From what I understand this is due to a gravity bubble above the pads that just won't allow some ships to lock down onto the pads. Please, I am asking for a clarification from CIG as to whether this gravity bubble issue is intended or not, and if not, when we will be able to see a fix coming soon? Personally, I would like to be able to fully land any ship that physically fits onto the pads, as it was mentioned in concept. @Nicou-CIG Thanks so much!