I need a reason why a almost same size ship changed it`s gun from 4s5 to 4s4 and after a few months, a new gunner ship got almost same spec the redeemer used to have. Wow, paladin got a S3 shield, while redeemer have 4S2 shield now. SO, ONE DAY, THE PALADIN WILL HAVE IT GUN AND SHIELD DONEGRADE LIKE REDEEMER BECAUSE CIG NEED TO SELL THE NEW SHIPS? THIS IS ACCEPTBLE IF WE DONT HAVE PALADIN HERE, BUT NOW, WHEN PALADIN COME OUT. I NEED A EXPLAIN WHY CIG NERFED CORSAIR AND REDEEMER. I know we need the game be balanced, but we do need to lost those CIG promised when they sell the ships? In my opinion, the shield/speed/handling is okay, maybe we could use ammo amount as a choice oneday. BUT NEVER WEAPON SIZE. Imagine that they decide to downgrade the Polaris torpedo to S9 because they dont know how to balance the larger ships` combat. WHICH IS ALMOST A PIECE OF XXXX NOW. Like this video said. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdri1euRk2Y&t=1s Its their duty to make every ship they designed suit its place in the game, but never by downgrade the components` size. Redeemer used to be designed for that S5 gun, and they just removed it. Does Eclipse need a down grade for the S9 torpedo if they cant make it balance in the further combat system? When is the end? the Polaris? the Perseus in 2026? or retaliate? The last edit: 1.the redeemer do have more guns, it do have more choice: 2s4+2s3+2s4 on the front/4s4+4s3 on the side/ 2s4 on the top/ 2s4+4s3 on the bottom but for paladin 4s5+2s4 on the most direction/4s5+4s4 on fighting with larger ships. I think most of you could notice that paladin could do better on 1 on 1 combat, and redeemer could not get such advantages while fighting with multiple ships. 2.we do need a promise that CIG won`t make any more marketing lead game balancing. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.