I've done some comparing at Game Debate on some CPUs and Graphics cards and have been surprised by the results. That leads me to suspect just how accurate Game Debate's rating system is. Example: I compared the i7-3770 cpu to the i5-6600K and the i5-6600K showed only 2% better. I compared the GTX 970 gigabyte G1 to the GTX 1060 gigabyte G1 6gb and the GTX 1060 is only 10% better. How does Game Debate come to these conclusions, as I'm sure they don't go through and test everything.