Question to the loremakers and branding teams - Why is Crusader the way that it is? It's founded by this humanitarian visionary who was the victim of state sponsored terrorism, and markets itself as the good guy manufacturer. Why is it the only manufacturer of indiscriminate bombers? Not even Aegis has a gravity bomber, they just build torpedo platforms. It's super weird. You would think that Dunlow would be a conscientious objector, even if contracted by the military they would just build logistics and support ships, but bombers are the tip of the spear when it comes to collateral damage. Is this a lore related topic? The current board has moved away from the ethics and vision of Dunlow to focus more on the bottom line? Is this a branding mistake? When the C2 was being concepted someone was like "it would be cool if it had bombs" and we got the A2 and now just have to live with the dissonance of this choice?