Just woke up this morning and all the social media that I use (reddit and youtube, plus spectrum... that's a lot by the way... don't judge me! :joy: ) were filled with SF vs SC posts. So here's my take on it: It's very simple. I'll play both. You should too if you like space games. Have a nice day. That said, after watching SF's video, there were 3 things I wish SC had (some we might still get it). - Outpost diversity and complexity. Granted we were shown only glimpses of some outposts (not talking about big cities here), but they seemed more "alive" than SC's. Hope SC gets there some day - Advanced ship customization. I know CIG is locked in the "variant philosophy" now, and it's already too late, but that ship customizer in SF just felt what I've always wanted in SC to be honest. - Realistic ship landings. I know, different game types, and SC still has it's thruster rework pending (or in the works). But seeing those ships landings and take offs in SF really felt realistic, as opposed to the "ships on sticks" we have now. Hope SC devs play the heck out of SF (including Chris Roberts), and learn a few things on how to improve SC. Now seriously... that is all. Again, have a nice day